Pixels & Pedagogy
  • Pedagogy
  • About Me
  • Courses

Visualizing Shakespeare, pt. V

4/26/2014

0 Comments

 
This is the fifth post in the series. To start from the beginning, click here.

The ambiguous nature of Ariel’s magic is also explored in the last image that I allow as an option for students: James Henry Nixon’s The Tempest (n.d.).
Picture
This watercolor depicts the report that Ariel gives about the tempest that he has orchestrated on Prospero’s behalf.  In this speech, Ariel says,

I flamed amazement. Sometime I'd divide, 
And burn in many places… The fire and cracks 
Of sulphurous roaring the most mighty Neptune 
Seem to besiege, and make his bold waves tremble, 
Yea, his dread trident shake. (1.2.199-200, 204-7)

We see in Nixon’s painting that Ariel himself seems to be glowing as if he is on fire, or “flames amazement.” The landscape in this painting is tumultuous, mirroring Miranda’s description about the sea and sky being at war with one another: “The sky, it seems, would pour down stinking pitch, / But that the sea, mounting to the welkin's cheek, / Dashes the fire out” (1.2. 3-5).  In Nixon, the land is caught in this elemental battle as well, and it is difficult to tell where land stops and sea begins. Ariel is an awe-striking creature in this image, poised on a brink between a Christ like and a demonic figure. On the one hand, Nixon references a series of biblical images—the transfigured Christ, Christ walking on the water, Moses parting the Red Sea—but on the other hand, Ferdinand recoils in obvious horror. Nixon’s depiction of Ferdinand accurately represents the text on this point; Ariel explicitly says that Ferdinand goes quite mad with terror: “The King's son Ferdinand, / With hair upstaring—then like reeds, not hair— / Was the first man that leaped; cried, ‘Hell is empty, / And all the devils are here’” (1.2.213-216). Nixon takes Ferdinand’s comment about devils, which in The Tempest is directed to the storm itself, and applies it directly to Ariel. Whereas Fuseli and Fitzgerald emphasize one reading of Ariel over another, Nixon manages to convey both possibilities of Ariel’s character by focusing on the character’s connection to elemental nature through both his beauty and his power.

Next page
Last page
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Claire Dawkins

    English Instructor at Stanford's Online High School

    Archives

    August 2015
    May 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

    Categories

    All
    Assignments
    Beaumont
    Behn
    Beowulf
    Bishop
    Brathwaite
    Cartier-Bresson
    Chaucer
    Coleridge
    Creative Writing
    Dickinson
    Donne
    Early American Literature
    Exams
    Gender Theory
    Genre
    Glaspell
    Horace
    John Smith
    Lesson Plans
    Literature Of Exploration
    Melville
    Milton
    My Smart Friends
    Ovid
    Pearl Poet
    Pynchon
    Queen Elizabeth I
    Rowlandson
    Shakespeare
    Sophocles
    Spenser
    Sterne
    Texts And Contexts
    Theory
    Visual Analysis
    Walker
    Whitman
    Williams
    Woolf
    Writing Instruction

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly